« John Kerry is Gone with the Wind... | Main | Whose Draft Is It Anyway? »
Mullahs For Kerry
Kerry has the most interesting supporters. From the SMCCDI's site is this bomb.
Some of the well known, US based, Islamic regime's apologists and lobbyists have mobilized in order to boost Senator J. Kerry's Presidential Campaign among the Iranian-American community. In that line, paid interviews with their controversial leaders or TV advertisements for Mr. Kerry, with two of the Los Angeles based TV networks, such as "Tamasha" and "Channel One", and "Radio 670 AM" have started since mid-September. But contrary to these three non scrupulous and money oriented networks, all the others, who have a sense of integrity, have rejected the substantial offers made to them.Why am I not surprised? Iran paying for Kerry spots. McCain-Feingold anyone? Must be a violation somewhere, an enemy state attempting to influence a U.S. election just doesn't seem right.
It's to note that the ultimate goal of Mr. Kerry's Iranian connections seems to be trying desperately to promote the Democratic candidate who's victory will bring a concilient US administration toward the shaky Mullhacracy.It gets better. This has been done before. One has to wonder why noone objected.
Most of the gang was heavily involved in trying to bring the Clinton Administration and the Mullahs together. Speeches and interviews were made, in the presence of the very same J. Kerry, portraying the Islamic regime as almost a kind of Islamic Disneyland and promoting the renew of ties. Madeleine Albright, the then secretary of State, was persuaded to offer the US apology to 'Iran' (meaning the Mullahs' regime). Meetings were organized between the two sides' officials. Money was widely distributed during several fundraisings for US lawmakers including for Senator Joseph Biden, in the Islamist center of Los Angeles which is headed by one of their close colleagues and friends named Sadegh Nemazikhah.Naturally Bush being President threw a monkey wrench in their plans thus they want Bush gone. One has to be careful what they do as they are using underhanded tactics.
They have learned the need to claim to be "bi-partisan" or "having just an educative mission" or "just focusing on the future and promotion of Iranians in the US without any goal in foreign policy". Fundraisers are now organized even for soft elements of the Republican camp, such as, Robert Ney and Arlene Specter under the cover of lobbying them for making better the situation of Iranian-Americans in the US, but astonishingly, it was the same Ney and Specter who few months ago announced their goal of engaging the Mullhas 'regime. The deep reality of the new used tactic seems to be the very same, meaning targeting the gradual legitimization of the Islamic republic with the parallel hope of helping it by the establishment of ties with a dreamed future Democratic administration.Why is it Democrats support despotic regimes? And Kerry will with disastrous results for the whole region. Instead of promoting democracy like Bush is doing with Iraq, Kerry will be supporting the most repressive Islamic fundamentalist regime giving the green light for expansion of their repression like to Iraq.
They are targeting the reversal of the increasing negative impression of John Kerry among the majority of Iranians and Iranian-Americans. To that end, the use of all kind of lies or creating fear about the possibility of military strikes or an invasion of Iran, in case of President George Bush's re-election, is on their agenda. Some of them are even playing on the arrests of several Iranians, who have had breached few years ago their immigration status, in order to claim that a new Bush administration might send back to Iran most Iranians living in the US.No wonder they have a negative impression of Kerry as he supports their oppressors. Bush is unlikely to strike Iran. Israel, however, just might. Irregardless, did anyone ever think Iranians might welcome a strike if it got rid of the Mullahs.
... they omit to mention that on the fate of the renegade and tyrannical Islamic regime and while rejecting any military option against Iran, Mr. Bush has at several occasions stated to wish to help the Iranians morally in order to bring down the theocratic dictatorship.As the Iranians themselves want to bring down the Mullahs, overthrow from within is the most rational strategy. If that fails however, Bush might have to revisit his thinking.
The apologists' desperation is due to the increasing popularity of Mr. Bush who's qualified by many Iranians as the "Messiah of Freedom". In contrary, Mr. Kerry has fallen from the eyes of many Iranians as he has promised to legitimize the Mullahcracy if elected. Worst of all, the Democratic candidate who's influenced by Akbar Ghahary and Hassan Nemazee, has announced his intention to make a "nuclear deal" with the terrorist and tyrannical regime ruling in Iran. Such a deal, if it takes place following Kerry's victory, would mean a legitimization of the Islamic regime and a green light for smashing the remain of Iranian opposition inside the country.Now that's scary. Iran is working to have nukes and Kerry would give them the go ahead. But it is not surprising that Kerry would legitimize the Mullahcracy considering his past dealings regarding Viet Nam. Kerry is known for dealing with and supporting the enemy.
Sue Strong blogged for Bush at 2:28 PM in category The Campaign Trail
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.blogsforbush.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2150
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mullahs For Kerry:
» An Emerging Iran Problem for Kerry from Weapons of Mass Discussion
I wrote a related story on Kerry's connections to Iran. [Read More]
Tracked on September 22, 2004 04:35 PM
Comments
I don't know my election laws, but I'd say that it is illegal for a foreign power to interfere or influence an American election. I think one of the reasons that the other networks is refusing an offer is probably because it's illegal. For what other reason would a network refuse a paying advertiser?
Posted by: Paul Sather at September 22, 2004 03:16 PM
Bloggers, follow this up very closely. I have a business partner who fled Iran because of an attack on his business and I can tell you that the mullahs are thugs, goons and racketeers. The ayatollahs brother walked up to my business partner one day and said "you have a great business and a great future, I now own 51% of your company and if you resist you will go to prison and never be seen again". My business partner is not a muslim (most Iranians aren't, but they must fake it or be killed) so he was dead meat. The secret police raided his house and found books about other religions and they had him. His choice - give 51% of his business away (and this would go to 75% then 100% in the future) or rot in prison for crimes against Islam. If you were John Kerry, Joseph Biden, Madelaine Albright or even Robert Ney or Arlene Specter would you accept money from these people? Would you welcome their endorsements?
Can Mr. Kerry be that confused and desparate?
Posted by: Roy at September 22, 2004 03:38 PM
Perhaps these were the "foreign leaders" who supported Kerry for US President?
Posted by: Crackpot at September 22, 2004 06:51 PM
Umn! minor point but Messer.Spector may get his panties in a twist being referred to as Arlene as opposed to Arlen!!!
Posted by: Xango Annie at September 22, 2004 10:31 PM
John Kerry's sister, Diane, was over in Australia last weekend. There is an election going on there too and right now, their Prime Minister, John Howard, is supporting the US in Iraq with troops on the ground.
In an attempt to influence the Australian elections, Diane Kerry told her Australian audience that Howard's support for the US in Iraq, has made them a bigger target for terrorist attacks.
Posted by: Faye ![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.blogsforbush.com/nav-commenters.gif)
at September 23, 2004 12:01 AM
I wonder if those mullahs are aware of the fact that waffles Kerry is pro-abortion. I mean, if they are REAL muslims (muslims means "true believers"), if they are, they would ABHOR someone that will clame to kill inocents in their mothers' wombs. I should have thought about this before I guess. It can be a bomb with the muslims.
Faye: That mingling of waffle's sis with your country is extraordinarely tasteless, opportunistic and debasing. Very telling about the kind of kin. Ugh.
Posted by: Fernando. at September 23, 2004 05:10 AM
glad to see we sold the Israelis 500 bunker busters.
the Israeli UN ambassador has basically said that the time for talking is almost over.
one can only hope that the talks collapse & the Iranian nuclear program is reduced to ruins before years' end.
the nuclear facilities were built by the Germans, I believe.
we should put our euro "allies" on notice that we will destroy any nuclear facility in the middle east WITHOUT NOTICE & WHILE UNDER CONSTRUCTION thus killing the foreign technicians.
imagine lieutenant kerry confronting this monumental issue - flip flopping & groveling before the UN - in essence, allowing another N Korea to emerge.
what a nightmare scenerio.
Posted by: OriginalOrrin at September 23, 2004 08:09 AM
Great article in todays NY Post.
Posted by: Faye at September 23, 2004 10:47 AM
Iraq the Model has a good commentary on his perception of the importance of keeping weapons out of the hands of the mullahs.
"There’s no way to think that the mullahs are showing all this determination in keeping their nuclear program and risking their existence for the sake of their country’s progress because they (the mullahs) just like all other oppressive regimes, don’t care a bit for the welfare of their people."
Posted by: MICHAEL in MI at September 23, 2004 09:33 PM
